Justice Department warns of a crackdown on ‘sanctuary’ policies [Video]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/justice-department-warns-of-a-crackdown-on-sanctuary-policies-013454113.html
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="But Washington County Sheriff Pat Garrett insisted to the Portland Tribune last week that “the report does not accurately describe the difficulties or potential legal ramifications associated with honoring ICE detainer requests.”” data-reactid=”48″ style=”margin: 0.8em 0px 0px; color: rgb(38, 40, 42); font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);”>Washington County Sheriff Pat Garrett insisted to the Portland Tribune last week that “the report does not accurately describe the difficulties or potential legal ramifications associated with honoring ICE detainer requests.”

<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="Garrett pointed to the 2014 decision by a U.S. District Court judge in Portland that led Washington County and pretty much every other county in Oregon — and several in Washington state — to stop complying with ICE detainers. In that case, the judge ruled that the Clackamas County Sheriff’s office had violated a woman’s Fourth Amendment rights by holding her on ICE’s request after she was eligible for release on bail. An ICE detainer, the federal judge declared, did not provide sufficient probable cause to warrant additional detention for the woman after bail had been granted.” data-reactid=”49″ style=”margin: 0.8em 0px 0px; color: rgb(38, 40, 42); font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);”>Garrett pointed to the 2014 decision by a U.S. District Court judge in Portland that led Washington County and pretty much every other county in Oregon — and several in Washington state — to stop complying with ICE detainers. In that case, the judge ruled that the Clackamas County Sheriff’s office had violated a woman’s Fourth Amendment rights by holding her on ICE’s request after she was eligible for release on bail. An ICE detainer, the federal judge declared, did not provide sufficient probable cause to warrant additional detention for the woman after bail had been granted.

<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="“We are doing nothing different than the other law enforcement agencies that are set forth in place by the courts, and they have all found that holding someone after they’ve satisfied the court is illegal,” a spokesperson for Florida’s Alachua County Sheriff’s Office said in response to the ICE report last week. “It’s illegal search and seizure.”” data-reactid=”50″ style=”margin: 0.8em 0px 0px; color: rgb(38, 40, 42); font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);”>“We are doing nothing different than the other law enforcement agencies that are set forth in place by the courts, and they have all found that holding someone after they’ve satisfied the court is illegal,” a spokesperson for Florida’s Alachua County Sheriff’s Office said in response to the ICE report last week. “It’s illegal search and seizure.”

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s